Mechanical Ventilation Errors and Patient Safety: A Narrative Review

Authors

  • Khalid Abdulwahab Ail Alshuwayrid Aero Medical Centre, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia Author
  • Sami saeed mubarak alqhtani Armed forces hospitals South region Author
  • Mohammed Ali Khubrani Armed horses hospitals south region Author
  • Abdullah Saad Alahmri Armed horses hospitals south region Author
  • Mohammed Oudah Al Suhayl Armed horses hospitals south region Author
  • Sultan ahmad albarqi Armed forces hospital southern region Author
  • Khaled Abdullah Alasmari Armed forces hospital southern region Author
  • Mohammed Ali Mohammed Alamri Armed Forces hospital southern region Author
  • Mohammed Fayez Alahmary Armed horses hospitals south region Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.64149/

Keywords:

mechanical ventilation; patient safety; ICU; ventilator-induced lung injury; errors; alarms; asynchrony; sedation; weaning

Abstract

Mechanical ventilation is a life-saving intervention in critical care and emergency medicine, yet it remains a high-risk therapy because outcomes depend on correct configuration of ventilator settings, continuous monitoring, timely troubleshooting, and reliable teamwork. Mechanical ventilation–related errors occur at initiation, during ongoing titration, and during weaning and extubation. Common errors include inaccurate tidal volume selection (often not based on predicted body weight), failure to measure and limit plateau or driving pressure, inappropriate positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) application, inadequate alarm configuration and response, delayed recognition of patient–ventilator asynchrony, and unsafe sedation and liberation practices. These errors can precipitate ventilator-induced lung injury (VILI), hemodynamic compromise, prolonged mechanical ventilation, ventilator-associated complications, longer intensive care unit (ICU) length of stay, and increased mortality. This narrative review synthesizes key evidence and translates it into a patient safety framework. We classify ventilation errors into setting-related, monitoring/alarm-related, and human/system-related domains, describe mechanisms linking errors to harm, and summarize evidence-based prevention strategies. Practical tools are provided, including tables that map errors to consequences and a daily ventilator safety checklist that can be embedded into ICU workflows. A systems approach combining lung-protective ventilation, structured monitoring, standardized handover, competency-based education, and continuous quality improvement is essential to reduce preventable harm in mechanically ventilated patients.

Author Biographies

  • Khalid Abdulwahab Ail Alshuwayrid, Aero Medical Centre, Dhahran, Saudi Arabia

    Nursing Technician, Critical Care Unit

  • Sami saeed mubarak alqhtani, Armed forces hospitals South region

    Specialist - Public health 

  • Mohammed Ali Khubrani , Armed horses hospitals south region

    Epidemiology

  • Abdullah Saad Alahmri, Armed horses hospitals south region

    Laboratory specialist

  • Mohammed Oudah Al Suhayl, Armed horses hospitals south region

    Radiological technology

  • Sultan ahmad albarqi, Armed forces hospital southern region

    Lab technician 

  • Khaled Abdullah Alasmari, Armed forces hospital southern region

    Lab Technician

  • Mohammed Ali Mohammed Alamri, Armed Forces hospital southern region

    Lab technician

  • Mohammed Fayez Alahmary , Armed horses hospitals south region

    Lab technician

Downloads

Published

2026-02-16

How to Cite

Mechanical Ventilation Errors and Patient Safety: A Narrative Review. (2026). Vascular and Endovascular Review, 9(1), 214-220. https://doi.org/10.64149/