Beyond the Patient: The Role of Clinical Data Managers in Mediating Human Identity in Modern Trials
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.64149/J.Ver.8.2s.321-331Keywords:
Clinical Data Management, Vascular Trials, Endovascular Data, Identity Curation, Clinical Data Managers, Data Standardization.Abstract
Clinical Data Managers (CDMs) are in a strategic position to mediate patient identity during the vascular trial turning subjective clinical inputs into standardized data structures. CDMs in the context of data-intensive environments make essential decisions that relate to edit checks, reconciliation of the timestamps, and codification practice that forms the way trial subjects are digitally represented. The aim was to investigate the role of clinical data managers in building, transformation and de-identification of patient identity in vascular studies through data handling and standardization practices. A qualitative research design was adapted where semi-structured interviews were used among CDMs (n=10), cardiac professionals, trial coordinators, and imaging analysts in order to examine the use of identity mediation in vascular trials. The information sources were query logs, audit trails and discrepancy reports. Thematic analysis was used to determine the major patterns that include identity curation, data abstraction, and algorithmic governance. Different viewpoints were guarantees by purposive sampling. The results show that CDM in vascular trials play a significant role in shaping patient identity wherein raw clinical data (ABI values, ECG data, and imaging results) are converted into standard formats. The clinical visibility, safety evaluation, and eligibility depend on their choices in data normalization, alignment of timestamps and adverse event coding. Such identity mediation issues concerns of re-identification, algorithmic bias, and depersonalization of governance of posthuman data. The research reinstates CDM as identity mediators in vascular trials and underlines their ethical involvement in data management and suggests patient-oriented leadership to retain clinical complexity and humanity.



